Video: The Samsung Galaxy Tab has an extremely durable screen

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Kt7ckZ9Xho[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWNoFOmYe9k[/youtube]

Apple boasts that the screen of the iPhone 4 terminal is made using a secret technological process and special materials so that its resistance is much greater than that of a normal touchscreen. Many people have compared the resistance of this screen with that of screens generically called "Gorilla glass" and some websites I support that the iPhone 4 terminal would practically have this technology implemented and this should result in a high impact resistance. Unfortunately PROVEN already that the screen of the iPhone 4 terminal is very fragile and it might not be made using this technology, but the Samsung Galaxy Tab tablet has a touchscreen made using this technology and you can see from the video clips above how resistant it is.

Practically in the video clips above a person Use a ball gun (made of copper) that works on the basis of CO2 to shoot the screen of the tablet and a glass placed in a bag. The tablet's screen remains intact after the 3 shots, but the glass is completely destroyed, so the people from Samsung worked a little hard to make the screen quite resistant. However, this test seems a little strange to me, what do you think?

For the sake of an exact comparison, below is a demonstration of the resistance of the Dell Streak screen made using the same technology as in the case of the Samsung tablet.

[viddler id=e3a6fa2e&w=580&h=380]

9 COMMENTS

  1. Fals. In primul video nu avea bila. iar in al doilea are bila. Asculta sunetul produs de pi.stol. In primul se aude sec si in al doilea se aude altfel. Acel pi.stol este o arma non letala, dar trasa de la acea distanta ea devine letala..Deci primul video este FALS

  2. E lunga lista… si mie mi se pare cam ciudat acel prim video daca te uiti bine tableta re si o folie aplicata peste ea. Daca e o folie invisibleshield atunci e clar ca rezultatul este neconcludent.

  3. Daca ar fi tras in tableta, aceasta s-ar fi miscat pt ca era sprijinita de un perete pe o plapuma. deci ar fi “tresarit” cel putin. Ca sa nu mai zic ca impactul bilei ar fi facut o unda de soc in ecran. Deci e fake.

    In orice caz, filmul cu pixul e impresionant.

  4. Avea folie pe el (invisible shueld probabil) care protejeaza foarte bn ecranu .l-a care se adauga si rezist ecranului din fabrica ,c e rezulta ca testu nu este corect.