ConsumerReports, a reputable American publication that tests all kinds of electronic products to provide purchase recommendations to users, tested the new iPhone 5S si iPhone 5C. According the results obtained by them, the terminals iPhone 5S si iPhone 5C they cannot be recommended for purchase in favor of some terminals Android because of the screen and battery life. Specifically, the new smartphones of Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC), they have weaker screens than high-end smartphones Samsung, LG or HTC, and the autonomy is lower than in the case of terminals Motorola Droid.
The iPhone 5s tops the already great iPhone 5 with a surprisingly reliable fingerprint reader, a faster processor, and a better-than-ever camera. And the affordable iPhone 5c is a compelling offer for budget-minded buyers. Consumer Reports testers found both phones delivered better performances than the iPhones they succeed—they even have longer talk times (a tad less than 7 hours). […]
Yet, battery life was still noticeably shorter than on other phones in our tests, including three of the latest Droids from Motorola, which ran for as long as 24 hours. Also, their small screens, while sharp and bright, can't beat the larger, sharper displays that adorn flagship models from Samsung, LG, and HTC.
These things are as true as can be, because iPhone 5S si iPhone 5C they will never have the battery autonomy of some terminals that have 3000 mAh batteries and at the moment they do not have 5 inch screens with 1080p resolution, so if one or both of these features is extremely important to you, it would be better to avoid these terminals. On the other hand, iPhones have other features that recommend them over Android terminals and I don't think it's necessary to repeat them, but you all know how to base your choices.
