Samsung's lawyers claim that Apple cannot stop Android in the courts

  Winning the most recent lawsuit against the company Samsung, Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC), he received the recommendation to attack directly Google if he tries to stop the spread Android-ul, the president of the jury that won the case Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC), offering this advice. Moving on, the main lawyer of SamsungJohn Quinn, said in an interview like Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC), should give up attempts to attack Androidin the courts. He claims that Apple must realize that it cannot stop the spread of Android through these processes, despite the fact that it continues to win them.

Up to this point, I think Apple really hadn't given up hope [it] could cripple Android somehow. This has got to be the last straw. They've got to realize they're not going to slow Android down by suing people. They (Apple) have nothing to show for the hundreds of millions of dollars they've spent. I'm sure they're looking for a graceful exit. … I'm pretty sure the Apple smartphone wars against Android are a thing with a limited future.”

  Leaving aside the somewhat desperate request to stop the proceedings, the lawyer of the Samsung he also brings a big truth into the discussion, saying that Apple has spent hundreds of millions of dollars attacking Android and the victories are not really that resounding. Apple won over 1 billion dollars from Samsung after only two lawsuits filed against the Koreans, but it spent enormous amounts of money to prove the guilt of those in South Korea and in the end no one really cares that Samsung is stealing.

  Although Apple started these lawsuits after repeated attempts to convince Samsung to innovate for its own products, simple legal actions are not enough. Apple would have generated much greater losses for Samsung if it had completely given up the services of its partner and the Koreans would have been left without the 10 billion dollars that Apple pays annually for components, and at that point there would probably have been a radical change of strategy. In the absence of radical measures, Samsung is doing exactly what it knows best, stealing and considering that the punishments are not even close to the level of theft, what can stop it from doing this in the future?