Huawei Mate 10 has very poor performance compared to iPhone 8, a first benchmark made after the official presentation of the phones showing that the new Kirin 970 chip is not performing well. You can see in the image below that the new Kirin 970 chip from Huawei does not give the Huawei Mate 10 phone better performance than the phones that have an integrated Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 chip, unfortunately.
Huawei Mate 10 is as weak in performance as Samsung Galaxy S8 or Samsung Galaxy Note 8, and compared to iPhone 8 or iPhone X the difference is colossal. The Huawei Mate 10 remains at the 6300 points registered in Geekbench, while the iPhone 8 or iPhone X they can reach up to 10400 points, so we are talking about a huge difference in performance offered thanks to Apple's new A11 Bionic chip.
Huawei Mate 10 presented this new Kirin 970 chip as a powerful one, but also based on artificial intelligence, but only the latter part remains valid at the moment. Basically, the Huawei Mate 10 fails to stand out from the ranks of standard Android phones with the performance it offers, and this is a major problem since the iPhone 8 and iPhone X are designed to offer excellent performance.
Huawei Mate 10 has very poor performance compared to iPhone 8
The Huawei Mate 10 will be a disappointment for the Chinese who are interested in the performance of a mobile phone, where this feature is extremely important. Considering that the Huawei Mate 10 cannot surpass the iPhone 8 or iPhone X in terms of performance, it is quite clear that many consumers will not be interested in looking at this series of phones and will pay attention to Apple's new iPhone models.
Huawei Mate 10 has exactly the same specifications as Huawei Mate 10 Pro, so the "premium" phone from Huawei should have identical results in benchmarks. In this situation, neither the Huawei Mate 10 nor the Huawei Mate 10 Pro will be a real competition for Apple phones due to their much lower performance, but they had very little chance anyway because they are produced by the Chinese.
Huawei Mate 10 and Huawei Mate 10 Pro are a series of phones that were supposed to attack iPhone 8 and iPhone X, but unfortunately they will only fight with models like OnePlus 5 or LG V30. Huawei Mate 10 and Huawei Mate 10 Pro will not have spectacular sales, but probably even the Huawei company did not expect that, so it will be interesting to see how much money the phones will be able to bring for the Chinese.
As far as we both know iPhone 8 loses to note 8 and oneplus5 in speedtest, you yourself posted that here. It's enough for the Mate 10 to be as fast as the Note 8 and it will also beat the iPhone 8.
The benchmark is another matter, who wants to brag about the results obtained there should buy their iPhone, but everyone knows that they cannot be seen in real use... for now. Let's see how long we have to wait until a final version of ios11 comes that will return the iPhone to at least the top 3. If it doesn't come at least with the iPhone X, it will be sad and bitter
The iPhone remains the smartphone with the best performing processor compared to Android smartphones, but remains the smartphone with the less developed operating system than Android.
Overall, you have a super-performing processor for nothing if the performance in everyday tasks is poor.
They put a CPU in the iPhone that they compared to the CPU in the ultrabook, because in the end, thanks to the software, the iPhone loses to Samsung. And Samsung isn't exactly using the fastest modified version of Android 7…
If the Mate 10 wins against the iPhone 8, it won't be a surprise, or maybe just for zaone...
we have to admit that ios is a ffffff limited and bald system
lol What I like is when you put something in front of you that only in some synthetic tests is superluminous and you don't even have the certainty that it's for real. that most cheat. In real life now, the experience offered by a Samsung, Huawei or LG is much better than an iPhone, there is no doubt about the design. I honestly like huawei models, and the top models are really sensational. My opinion is that this mate10pro is above any iphone.
It was great in the presentation when he compared the old fingerprint sensor with the much praised Face ID, and they were right, it's much faster and easier to use the fingerprint sensor, and that when you unlock the phone 30-40 times a day the difference. I hope the fingerprint sensor is never removed from an android flagship
Exact!
Mate 10 Pro looks good...I know Mate9 Pro and for sure 10 is over...can't wait to see the blue one...I think it will be over 8...x remains the leader
No one pays 2 bucks for these tests!
But this is just marketing. Face, touch id blah blah blah are just some options that you use or not. All the pine remains on the base. You have PIN for credit card, SIM, blocking, unlocking...etc.
True!!!!! Maybe just some naive people who think that their phone will fly just because it has a processing power compared to a laptop.
huawei mate 10 porche design is superb, that's just the top of the range. it really looks premium compared to iphone X
But iphone X with what is this premium?!?! As it also has 2 glass faces and a metal frame!!! I think you were referring to the mi note 2 which has ceramic and that is really sensational and premium.
Touching the phone with a finger and turning it on in 0,33s is the best, unsurpassed.
It is impossible that a facial, iris, or whatever else they invent will be simpler and faster than touching the phone with a finger.
Maybe an iris scanner is more secure, good to use when making payments, but otherwise you don't need more than a good fingerprint sensor.
Ouch
I conclude that the best phone is the one you use every day, regardless of the phone or brand
Let's leave these synthetic tests fake and paid for. So the iPhone 8/X processor in these tests is faster than a MacBook Pro 13″, but in everyday life it moves like last year's iPhone 7. OS optimization is also very important, and at the moment iOS seems to have some problems lately.
Off... if you knew how many people buy a phone based on these tests and results... there are crazy people all over the planet.
Totally agree with you, anyway if it turns out that Samsung will have an almost stock android interface (although I kind of doubt it) as a YouTube user posted things could be much different in the future
Oh, these Androids, who are running around here, don't tell me that you won't get a lump in your throat when you see the huge difference in performance, as it comes out on the market, iOS X will be fine-tuned with performance and in everyday applications... so stay calm as if I see tomorrow the day after tomorrow what paws you will take over the face from the Serb rightfully so
Rest assured that this will not happen
Was anything written here false?…. What makes a huge difference in performance when ios only has problems with the cart that Apple engineers can't control
Will iOS catch up with performance when iX comes out? ??????, well, until then, what are you waiting for? New Year's Eve ??????, i8 and i8 Plus are not good? ??, wait ios after iX, god how pathetic
Yes, you are right. You are talking about a phone that is not even on the market. If you had an overview and not that of the herd, maybe you would also realize that out of 10 articles published, 7 are about how the competition steals/copies Apple and 3 about ios, how it is the most optimized operating system. At the same time, you also find 5-6 mentions of how in some synthetic tests this famous processor breaks everything.
My question is: can it break the bank with just one processor?!?! Because otherwise I didn't see anything notable. 2 glass faces, camera in line with the other top phones, wireless charging blah blah. And I ask you, where do you see innovation?!?! They came with a foldable display, the battery somehow has a week's autonomy?!?!
And yes, the mate10 won't sell like the iphone, but it will definitely take a good bite out of the market, which will eventually be smaller and smaller, because you can't come 5 years or whatever from the iphone6 and only change the number .
Look at Samsung, for example, when they set out to make really good phones, absolutely all of them were hits and always brought something more than the competition.
Agree, but the fingerprint sensor must be on the face. On the back it is completely useless
It should, only if it were true, but it isn't, so it doesn't.