RCS & RDS. WITHOUT ANY LOSS in an IMPORTANT PROCESS

RCS & RDS. Without the help of SRI, the company lost in a very important process, here is what the court decided, and what the effects are for customers.

RCS & RDS sri

RCS & RDS. Without the help of SRI, the company lost in court a request to annul a decision of the National Supervisory Authority for the Processing of Personal Data (ANSPDCP), which came with a fine. RCS & RDS was targeted by an ex officio investigation by ANSPDCP, which discovered that the operative collected personal data from customers, without asking for their express consent, RCS & RDS being obliged to delete the respective data.

RCS & RDS. Among the personal data collected by the company is the personal numerical code, CNP, and in the first instance her request was rejected, but the process does not end here. Without the help of the SRI, as happened in the case Vodafone, those from RCS & RDS could not convince the court that the respective data is useful for something, but they will probably ask for the help of the information service.

RCS & RDS. Without SRI, it loses in an important process

RCS & RDS. Those from Vodafone managed to escape a similar decision, but also a fine, with the help of the SRI, which said that the personal data of the customers cannot be deleted for reasons related to national security. During the RCS & RDS there is no intervention by those from the SRI, but that case will probably be referred to so that the court will give them a win because of those from Digi, who upon request must provide this information to the SRI, the police , packages, or the courts.

RCS & RDS. The GDPR regulation prohibits the collection of personal data without people's consent, but in the case of telecom operators, these data can sometimes be used to identify people in criminal investigations, or those related to national security. In this idea, it is unlikely that RCS & RDS will have the ANSPDCP decision upheld against it, even if the SRI will not intervene to convince the court that that decision should not be upheld.