The Samsung Galaxy S3 is presented as having a screen that recognizes touches much more accurately than that of the iPhone 5S and iPhone 5C (Video)

[youtube]http://youtu.be/qw3OkC5CaZU[/youtube]

  A few weeks ago, benchmarks appeared that showed us that iDevices have screens that recognize commands much faster than Android or Windows Phone terminals, and a recent test tries to demonstrate that things would not be so "rosy". More precisely, a company thought to test the accuracy of the Retina Displays thought by Apple Lossless Audio CODEC (ALAC),, and their result should demonstrate the fact that the lower central part of the screen has high accuracy in recognizing touches, but the side edges and the upper part would not be so well calibrated.

  Contrary to what was discovered in iPhone 5S si iPhone 5C, Samsung Galaxy S3 it has a screen whose accuracy is much more accurate across the screen, and the image above should be as "eloquent" as possible. Using a robot for tests, those who thought up the study noticed that the Retina Displays correctly register the touches in the central area of ​​the virtual keyboard, and its edges are not so well covered by the sensors, and this is quite true.

  However, despite the inaccuracies, it is extremely difficult for me to believe that the screen of the Samsung terminal is as accurate as the one shown in the first image, which is practically perfect compared to the screen in iPhone 5S or iPhone 5C which seems made for a Chinese clone.

UPDATED: The results of this test are, although surprising, correct, but they do not take into account an intelligent system implemented by Apple in iOS. The American company calibrated its screens and iOS to recognize touches depending on how the screen is held in the hand, and the test did not reproduce a degree of real use. Practically, in the case of placing the terminal on a flat surface, the results will be very bad, because Apple designed iOS to compensate the accuracy with the way the terminal is held in the hand, but even so, the edges generate quite a lot of errors during use.