iPhone XR. OnePlus 6T TOTALLY HUMILIATED in Performance

iPhone XR. A first performance test shows us how the OnePlus 6T humiliates, surprisingly, from almost every point of view with the novelties offered by Apple.

iphone xr oneplus 6t performance

iPhone XR. A first comparison regarding the performances compared to OnePlus 6T it shows us that Apple manages to humiliate its competition in the Android segment again, although its phone only has 3 GB of RAM, compared to 4 GB of RAM in the iPhone XS. The iPhone XR humiliates the OnePlus 6T in a test regarding the speed with which applications are opened, and video editing is done, the processor in the A12 chip being clearly superior to the one in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 chip, used by the Chinese.

iPhone XR. Both in the first part of the test and in the second, the OnePlus 6T is surpassed without a right to appeal by the phone from Apple, this despite the fact that it has no less than 8 GB of RAM memory, which does not it helps. The iPhone XR can't keep all the apps open in the background, because it only has 3 GB of RAM, but that doesn't matter too much, because the OnePlus 6T can't catch up due to the fact that it does video processing too slowly.

iPhone XR. OnePlus 6T TOTALLY HUMILIATED in Performance

iPhone XR. The OnePlus 6T would not have been surpassed in terms of performance if it could do video processing as fast as the Apple phone, and this is because in the first part of the test the phones were equal, until editing, and the RAM would have helped. On the other hand, the iPhone XR opens faster than the OnePlus 6T, but the Android phone has slightly better Wi-Fi performance than the Apple phone, which is hard to notice in normal use.

iPhone XR. It is interesting that Face ID is even faster than the unlocking system using the fingerprint reader in the OnePlus 6T screen, but facial unlocking with the Android phone is faster, because it is "toy". To be completely honest, I'm amazed that the iPhone XR performs so well compared to the OnePlus 6T, and I would have expected otherwise, but the $200 price difference between them will matter to many.