Samsung. AMAZING, The Proposal Made by Apple and Google

Does he just need a new name?

Blacklist is Crime, Drama, Mystery while your series you are based on is registered as Drama, Sci-Fi, Thriller
If you know what Sci-fi means... you will realize how embarrassing you are when you associate the Sci-fi series with reality
PS: see that believe is written believe me!

Samsung and the rest can really be used as a pretext that starting from 2019, Samsung no longer makes pocket mobile phones... but only for satchels

Their Bv

Well, until all the companies develop their own technologies, it will take longer, so Samsung is doing a good deed :))) well done to them

The one from Huawei seems clearly superior to me

It is known that Samsung's fortunes do not come from mobile phones, I am not surprised that they want to take out their money, the money put into foldables with an uncertain future, which in my opinion is a dead project. Let them manage further, not to fool others into putting money into their Caritas. I hope that Apple doesn't screw up, I still maintain my opinion that Apple will not make an ostrich-camel out of this with the least questionable user experience. As if Samsung has money to annoy him, Viorel's story is that he makes $1 billion in profit/day, what happened?

Does he just need a new name?

Which everyone? How many of the hundreds or even thousands of patents has Apple materialized? You think everything that flies is eaten, right? Apple doesn't release something like that, chill.

We believe the future really cannot be predicted very well. Anything can happen.
I recommend the series Black Mirror. Each episode shows you how humanity can transform. It's really wow. It is based quite a lot on reality and how it can become.

I will look, thanks for the tip. Anyway, if I don't like the first episode, I won't watch it. It was the same with Games of Thrones, after the first episode I said bye. I don't like series/movies that have nothing to do with reality. Do you watch Blacklist? ?

The first episodes may seem something like "Wtf what's this?!?!" But from the end of season 1 everything will become clearer. In one episode it was about a man who tried some kind of beta of a horror game. The game didn't run on a PC or something. The game was run with the help of the brain. The brain played the role of the processor and thus the player's fears could be found. I don't want to say too much, but it's quite interesting.
I didn't watch Blacklist. I kept hearing about him. I will try it.

well, even after 5-6 years, Apple still hasn't released a 2in1 like surface pro...it's clear that it doesn't put the bot or doesn't make products that are 2in1 only on paper but not in front of its users

Blacklist is Crime, Drama, Mystery while your series you are based on is registered as Drama, Sci-Fi, Thriller
If you know what Sci-fi means... you will realize how embarrassing you are when you associate the Sci-fi series with reality
PS: see that believe is written believe me!

yes, that 5G S10 is bigger than the Note 9... China jumped in size
Foldable is already as folded as China and India
Samsung and the rest? does it have its own OS or its own ecosystem, so that by definition, what you say is true?!
Liviu Guta, we can only laugh at you

Samsung and the rest can really be used as a pretext that starting from 2019, Samsung no longer makes pocket mobile phones... but only for satchels

Excuse me for asking, but did I ever say that Samsung makes $1 billion/day in profit? I do not believe…
Two: you have the head to judge clearly, you don't have to form your opinion from a source of information that distorts reality on a daily basis.
You write that Samsung wants to get rid of its stupid investment in foldables. Have you assessed how big the investment is and how much income they will have?
Do you think that a giant company like Samsung does not know how to make investment decisions? I have higher education in economics and in the university curriculum I had the subject of "Investment evaluation". I would tell you that it is a whole science how to mathematically evaluate investments, and at this level no one invests stupidly.

Samsung by no means set out to recoup its investment in 2 years from the launch of the Fold. The investment will be amortized in at least 10 years because further investments will be made that will generate other money.

In this equation, Apple is a mere pawn, a hungry fat man manipulated by McDonald's into buying its delicacies.
I'm going to hold my tail up like crazy that Apple is strong but I've never seen a weaker Apple from an innovation perspective.

For now, Samsung and Huawei are in the limelight for coming up with a revolutionary product. Apple is still innovating with case colors.

If Samsung wanted to sell smaller screens to Apple, it was probably the chipped screens on the edges, resulting from manufacturing defects in the first generation.
I see this as a humiliation that Samsung gives to Apple through a handkerchief: "take me some crumbs, some bones to gnaw a little so you don't say I'm a bad company" ????
Halal "the most innovative company in the world"

It is the most innovative. Innovations also exist in the business world. And we must admit here that, in this field, Apple is the most innovative. No company on the planet can take the money so easily on a phone that has reached the dozen. And with a 5 W charger hahahaaha. I am selling you a phone for 1500 euros with a 5 W charger. And these trumpet players here are happy like the suckers that Apple has made a record of receipts, but the money is from their pocket. Probably these snobs who stayed in the last decade have the feeling that Apple has a money plantation.
This while those Chinese "xeroxists" charge top-of-the-line phones costing 20 euros with 44 W wireless and 500 W on cable

aberrant

I also didn't understand why the poor are happy that Apple is the profit champion on their money.. It's as if the popes would report fortunes, houses, cars, businesses and the faithful babes and grandfathers would be happy that the popes are the most rich from old men's money.
On the contrary, I would be outraged to see them pay more than others, especially for inferior products.

As far as Apple innovation goes, it's…

Good for them, it's normal to try to sell their goods.

Apple registers patents that never become reality, instead it shamelessly steals the patents and technologies of others.

I guess you think differently when Samsung reports profit, then it's good, right?
Apple innovation?
-Apple releases the first iPhone, the whole market suddenly changes and follows it
-Apple removes iPhone 4 from glass and aluminum, everyone removes the same (Samsung harder, barely with S6)
-iPhone 4 comes with a micro-sim, what is this, do you have to cut the card? Everyone is getting micro-sim phones out.
- Does iPhone 5 come with nano-sim? What's this, are we cutting the card again? Yep, everyone has nano-sim now. Not to mention the banal sim key, did you know what it was until the S6?
-iPhone 5S comes with the first 64-bit processor and fingerprint sensor. Everyone is slowly switching to a 64-bit processor and fingerprint sensor (Samsung is in a hurry and removes swipe to unlock on the S5, which is rubbish, then fixed as Apple also has in the S6.)
- bring out the Apple iPad, everyone must have a tablet too
-Apple releases notch and animoji with iPhone X, a lot of Android phones also have a notch. Samsung still doesn't just bring out ar Emoji.
These are just a few that come to mind right now.
Samsung, instead, what has it innovated outside of screens?
-Samsung Beam, projector phone, no one followed, not even Samsung.
- USB 3 in Note 3, no one followed, removed immediately then in Note 4.
-remove IP67 and microSD from S6 (even though S5 had both), 16 mpx camera, comes back from the hangover and in S7 we find both plus the 12 mpx camera (the experiment with 16 mpx failed).
- takes out Bada os, no one follows him, no one wants him.
-takes out the only phone in the world that, due to the danger it represents, is withdrawn from the market (only after the second series of explosions of the so-called revised and safe phones this time).
Not even the Note series is followed and copied by anyone in the Android world. And that's not like, for example, Huawei wouldn't be able to release it.
So what did Samsung innovate that was copied by everyone, let's say the majority?
As I said, apart from amoled.

Your problem is that you think that Apple is the center of the universe and everyone is copying Apple. You gave me a list of innovations that are falsely attributed to Apple. I'll show you them one by one:

1. Apple did NOT invent the first smartphone. Before the iPhone, there were a lot of smartphones with which you surf the Internet, listen to music, etc. Apple's credit is that it popularized the smartphone with a touch screen for which you no longer needed a pen, but your finger, but in no case can it be credited with inventing the smartphone. Moreover, when the iPhone 3 was launched, the product was non-functional and Steve Jobs lied to everyone that the iPhone could do what it was unable to do. As I said: the lie

2. That's right, Apple first introduced the micro-sim and then the nano-sim. But what invention is this??? Is there some technology and I don't know? It is a different size format of the SIM and it got here because the dimensions of the casings have been reduced simultaneously with the increase of the batteries.
It's something that Apple has pushed from the back, but it's nowhere near a technology that has led to the advancement of the industry;

3. The iPhone 5s was NOT the first smartphone with a 64-bit processor!!! Anyway, in 2013 when it appeared, the iPhone had 1 GB of RAM, enough for 32-bits that can use up to 4 GB of RAM. The 64-bit processor uses a practically unlimited amount of RAM memory, but for smartphone applications you don't need to use more than 4 GB of RAM; he little not in 2013.
In other words, the A7 processor had 64-bits ALREADY. Just to be the first with something that brought absolutely nothing compared to 32-bits.
In the Android world, the transition to 64-bits was done head on, when smartphones had 4 GB of RAM.

4. Apple did not invent the fingerprint scanner, but only popularized it. Fingerprint scanners were on laptops, and even on older smartphones, such as Toshiba G500, G600 or Motorola Atrix.
The scanner on the iPhone 5S was a big fad, which gave misses. If Samsung made a scanner with the movement of the finger, it is because they did not want to have patent problems.
The iPhone has never made a high-performance scanner. Look at what you have on the market today: the iPhone is cabbage.

5. If other Androids are stupid, it doesn't mean that Apple has innovated something.

The innovations you speak of are without substance. They do not bring anything substantial to the technical evolution. Why does it bother you that it went from mini-SIM to micro-SIM and then to nano-SIM? Did you feel something interesting?
What does the key of the SIM drawer, the chips innovated by Apple, heat you up with? Samsung and the other manufacturers had spring-loaded drawers. You didn't need any key to open the drawer, a much more elegant solution.

I'm back with another message.

What you write about Samsung is in bad faith... Unfortunately, you've made a fool of yourself. You are all the same. What did Samsung innovate apart from screens?? Hahahahaha…
First of all, only the screen of a smartphone sums up 95% of the experience of using a smartphone. Not the scores of thousands of points in Antutu or other benchmarks.

Samsung brought the following to the industry:
- 3G and 4G technologies. Without the communication technologies that Samsung worked on before the iPhone, there would be no iPhone today.
– the OLED screen, which redefined the smartphone industry. If it was after Apple, you still had LCD today. In fact, not even that much because Apple has no contribution to any technology used in the screens
– the phablet format: how Samsung released large smartphones, and Apple released it too. Apple tried to convince the world with "this is a common sense screen", but no one listened to Apple's poisonous advice. The world went on big screens and today you can see the result.
– the edge-to-edge screen: how Samsung released edge-to-edge screens starting with the S6 edge, and Apple came to buy the screens made by others.
- S-Pen: how Samsung released an S-Pen, hop and Apple with the Apple Pencil that is inserted into the iPad in a Tim Cuc-ulesc way
– Wireless charging: as Samsung introduced wireless charging, Apple also introduced the same option. Some like Serbs dreamed of loading SF from a distance, but please... that's another story
- optical stabilization of the camera: obviously, after Samsung introduced it, Apple came with the same feature
- front camera: after the introduction of the Samsung S II, Apple also thought of adding a front camera
– plastic cases: after Apple made fun of plastic being cheap, they also put in the "cheap" iPhone of 500 euros, called iPhone 5C (from Cheap)
- the launch of two smartphone models from the same generation: Samsung started with the S3 series: S3 + S3 mini and continued long and well. Evidently, Apple also came with the iPhone + iPhone Plus series
– the name "Plus" shamelessly stolen from Samsung!!!! I know that on this site you are intoxicated that in fact Samsung copied from Apple, but it is the other way around; Apple copied the name Plus from Samsung :)))))
– fast charging
– diminution of bezels
– screens with higher resolutions and higher ppi
- water and dust resistance
– the multiple colors of the cases (before the Samsung S3, the iPhone was only white and black)

Other Apple brand copies from other manufacturers:
– stereo speakers
– Hey Siri (after Hello Google)
– Apple Maps (a poor quality service; at least if they copied it well)
– public transport in Apple Maps (obviously, according to Google Maps)
– the design of Braun products
– the format of the iPhone from LG and from Samsung (model F700)
- Raise to wake
– Tap to wake
- facial unlocking
– without the Home button
– the smartwatch that came after Motorola
– 3D Touch shamelessly copied from Huawei (Force Touch)
– side-by-side windows in Mac OS (idea stolen from Windows)
– picture-in-picture from Android
– third-party keyboards (the iOS keyboard is a disaster)
– notification center (stolen from Android)
– Low power mode (stolen from Android)
- swipe gestures in Mail
- split screen in iPad
– the small tablet format
- predictive texts while typing
- synchronization of photos in iCloud (which is implemented without Google Photos)
– now you can download a demo of a game from the App Store; before Google, you couldn't
– automatic updates
– OTA updates

- the graphic interface of the Mac OS operating system, from Xerox
– all-in-one computer (after Commodore PET 2001)
– swipe-to-unlock (according to Neonode N1m), on the basis of which Samsung sued.

PS: Apple also invented that animated kk that imitates your face :)))))) Cool!

Who the hell puts the muzzle to the samsug. A company of ordinary xeroxists that use the same mocha android as hundreds of other manufacturers. Does Samsung represent something...? Yes ! More precisely, A BIG LAIE...!!! Shit with Android like thousands of other devices....

It's Viorel, you hit your head hard, boy...

Try to write correctly, then judge other users……at least if you came with counterarguments….man said true things, hard to digest for some like you, Serb, etc.

- "3G technologies and 4G technologies". I didn't know that Samsung invented 3G and 4G. I knew that LTE was developed by 3GPPP and IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). Samsung might be part of one of these, I don't know for sure.
-"phablet format: how Samsung released large smartphones, hop and Apple released". How long has it been since the first Note until Apple released the iPhone 6 Plus? Here they did not follow Samsung, but followed the trend of larger screens like the rest of the manufacturers.
-“- the OLED screen, which redefined the smartphone industry.” I said outside of amoled screens!
-"the edge-to-edge screen: how Samsung released edge-to-edge screens starting with the S6 edge, whoop and Apple came to buy the screens made by others."
Does the S6 edge have an edge to edge screen? Confused with the curved screen, Apple didn't come to buy screens from Samsung until the S6.
-"S-Pen: how Samsung released an S-Pen, hop and Apple with Apple Pencil". S-pen debuted and is still on the Note series, i.e. smartphone. Is there an Apple smartphone with Apple Pencil? This is taken out of context with the pencil, Apple said that it will not remove the pen for the phone, it did not say anything about other devices (such as tablets).
-"Wireless charging: how Samsung introduced wireless charging, and Apple introduced the same option". I could also say that "how Nokia put wireless charging in the 820,920 and Google and LG in the Nexus, not really hop (just over 2 years), hop and Samsung put the same option". Samsung did not invent any kind of wireless charging,"Oral-B rechargeable toothbrushes by the Braun company have used inductive charging since the early 1990s." And Nokia and LG phones (and others) were already two years old before Samsung implemented it.
And about the camera, who first introduced the dual camera between the two? Of the two, not the first in the world.
-"the launch of two smartphone models from the same generation: Samsung started with the series: S3 + S3 mini.
The S3 mini was not a smaller S3 but with the same features. It had much weaker hardware than its older brother and was (rightly) considered the cheap version of S3. At Apple, on the other hand, both had the same hardware, both the small and the large.
-"3D Touch shamelessly copied from Huawei (Force Touch)".
What the??? This is something like "The fold screen shamelessly copied by Samsung (Flexpai)"!!! It was known long before that Apple was working on something like this, but shortly before the launch of the 6S, Huawei quickly released a stupid one just to let the world know that it was the first. He gave a pale imitation of some kind of force touch. Have you heard anything since then about Huawei's force touch? On which phones is it still available?

I didn't say Samsung invented 3G and 4G. These are technologies too complex to be invented by a single company. I was referring to the technological innovations that Samsung has contributed to. Samsung has thousands of patents in 3G and 4G. Without them there would be no iPhone. How do you think Apple came from the first with a phone? A company that made computers first developed a phone…

Yes, Samsung initiated the phablet series. I'm not saying that after a month Apple also came, but I'm saying that Apple followed the leader. Apple, copy-cat!

Samsung has edge to edge screens since the 6 series. Apple just followed Samsung's design lines. Until the iPhone X, the iPhone had some rough edges at the top and bottom.

Samsung S4 had wireless charging and was released in March 2013. Google Nexus had wireless charging in July 2014. Samsung was among the first with wireless charging and Apple was among the last, so because it is the most innovative company in the world ???
By your logic, neither Apple invented the 64-bit processor nor the fingerprint sensor.

Yes Samsung launched 2 models to be offered to two categories of consumers. One was weaker but what's the problem? There were two different products in screen size.
Samsung has divided the product portfolio into several categories: S, J, A, Note, etc. So did Apple: iPhone, iPhone Plus, 5C, 5SE. Apple copy cat!

You think a technology develops in a month, right? ????? Huawei has been working on Force Touch for a long time. A piece of crap that nobody uses.

Apple is a company that made a significant contribution to the smartphone industry, but when Steve Jobs died, so did Apple's innovation. Now, Apple is copycat and has no ability to innovate. The leaders follow.

Taptic feedback that no one? Just listen to land rover and others, learn more if you still don't have the money to find out on your own experience
By the way, how long you have shows how obsessed you are with trying to make others think as stupid as you.

They want to worship :)))

Hahaha, the perfect comparison with popies