Iata motivul retragerii aplicatiei VLC din AppStore

Dupa cum stiti deja, aplicatia VLC a fost retrasa din AppStore saptamana trecuta de catre Apple pe motivul incalcarii regulilor privind posibilitatea de a folosi aplicatia pe mai mult de 5 iDevice-uri. Aceasta a fost presupunerea in baza careia toata lumea a prezentat stirea saptamana trecuta insa in realitate nimeni nu stie, nici macar developerii aplicatiei, motivul adevarat pentru care aplicatia a fost retrasa. Presedintele companiei VideoLAN a fost instiintat de un avocat al companiei Apple ca aplicatia VLC a fost retrasa din AppStore insa nu i s-a explicat si motivul pentru retragere.

At last, Apple has removed VLC media player from its application store. Thus the incompatibility between the GNU General Public License and the AppStore terms of use is resolved – the hard way. I am not going to pity the owners of iDevices, and not even the MobileVLC developers who doubtless wasted a lot of their time. This end should not have come to a surprise to anyone.

Aplicatia VLC este dezvoltata sub licenta GNU care practic inseamna ca oricine poate folosi aplicatia fara nici un fel de retrictie. Apple impune o limita de 5 device-uri pe care poate fi folosita o aplicatie deci e cat se poate de clar ca aplicatia VLC incalca aceasta regula. Dezvoltatorul aplicatiei a instiintat Apple cu privire la aceasta incompatibilitate acum mai bine de 2 luni insa de atunci si pana acum Apple nu s-a obosit sa modifice respectiva regula desi a facut alte modificari prin regulamente. In concluzie nimeni, nici macar developerul aplicatiei, nu stie de ce a luat Apple aceasta decizie si probabil nici nu vom afla vreodata. Pana una alta puteti descarca aplicatia din Cydia.

Iata ce a declarat developerul aplicatiei pe blogul companiei.

On January 7th, I was told by an Apple attorney that VLC media player had been removed from the App Store. That is how I was able to break the news first. However as can be expected from an attoryney, there was not really any explanation. A number of people and -unfortunately- popular bloggers have jumped to the obvious conclusion: the VideoLAN project, and I in particular would be idealist morons who care more about technical license details than users, and we would have constrained Apple. This is not quite true.

First, even I do not know for certain why Apple removed VLC, and Apple will probably never state the truth.

Second, Apple has already removed VLC from the “old” Mac Store for computers… already about 4 years ago, at a time when VLC was one of the most popular applications, and I am yet to learn the reasons why.

Third, Apple received my copyright notification more than 2 months before they pulled the application. This was not expedited, as the US copyright law would require. As such, it seems dubious that my well-publicized notification from last october is the root cause of the removal. It is nevertheless the reason why I was learnt directly from Apple that VLC was removed.

Last, Apple had the power and plenty of time (2 months) to adjust and clarifiy the terms of the App Store. Indeed, said terms were modified several times since then. Alternatively, Apple could even have continued to carry VLC implicitly distributed under the GPL by Applidium. This is effectively what I believe the situation was before the removal.

All in all, we will probably never know the truth. But I am inclined to believe what Eben Mogel, from the Software Freedom Law Center, foretold me 2 months ago: Apple would remove VLC simply because it cannot stand software distributed under the GPL on its stores. But, it is Apple’s choice and business decision, therefore Apple would have no reasons to expedite the process. It could also be that they do specifically not fancy VLC on their platforms. That would account for the removal from the Mac Store a long time ago.

I know this would be disappointing to the many Apple fanboys who have insulted or slandered me on the web or over email in the last few days. But I might not be the (anti-)hero people made me.

1 COMENTARIU

  1. Deci “adevăratul motiv” este tot cel pe care-l știm, adică licențe incompatibile, însă însoțit, de data aceasta, de tânguiri și relativări cum că “adevărul nu-l vom afla niciodată”. E clar că omul e supărat și cred că Apple ar fi putut să-și modifice licența pentru produse oferite gratuit, însă probabil sunt rațiuni tehnice sau juridice care nu permit aceasta.